This blog was created to help individuals with questions they may have about e-reader devices or devices with apps for digital materials. It is moderated by a group of dedicated librarians from the Stark County District Library.
Showing posts with label legal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label legal. Show all posts
Tuesday, November 27, 2012
If you own a Kindle, you’ve likely already heard that three publishers have settled with the Department of Justice concerning an anti-trust suit alleging that publishers colluded to fix the price of ebooks. Amazon has sent emails to Kindle owners alerting them that soon they should receive store credit that can be used to buy either ebooks or other merchandize from Amazon. (Kindle owners can also request a check.) These credits apply to ebooks purchased from the three publishers who have settled—Hachette, Harper Collins, and Simon & Schuster—that were purchased between April 2010 and May 2012. Publishers Penguin and Macmillan, as well as Apple, are still fighting the charges. No court date has yet been set, but it appears as though the case may not make it to court until next year. Also, there is no word yet on how the announced merger between Penguin and Random House (the only major publisher not charged by the Department of Justice for price fixing) may affect Penguin’s role in the suit and ebook retailing in general.
Thursday, April 19, 2012
Anti-Trust Update
Several questions come to mind with the announcement
that Apple Inc. and five publishers have been sued for anti-trust violations on
the pricing of e-books. The one most
people will be asking themselves is “What does this mean for me?” Apple and two publishers, Macmillan and Penguin,
have refused to settle and pledge to go to trial, with the next court date set for June 22. However, three publishers (Simon and Schuster,
Hachette, and HarperCollins) have already settled with the Department of
Justice and 16 States Attorney Generals (including Ohio). Assuming the settlements are approved, the publishers
must renegotiate their contracts with Apple, as well as other e-book retailers,
following the 60 day comment period and the termination of existing
contracts. This means that nothing will
likely change until June at the earliest as far as the pricing of e-books is concerned. At that time, the new contracts the three
publishers who have settled make with retailers such as Amazon could allow for
steep discounting any even bundling (Buy One, Get One, for example). But there will be limits on how inexpensively
retailers will be able to sell e-books, because they will not be permitted to
set the prices so low that the publisher’s catalog is sold at a loss. In other words, the new contracts can “prevent
e-book retailers from cumulatively selling that Settling Defendant’s e-books at
a loss over the period of the contract.” (Full text of the case filed.)
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
Publishers and Apple Inc Being Sued for Anti-Trust Violations
The past two days have seen some real shake ups
in the e-book market. Yesterday, it was
reported that the “Big Six” publishers—HarperCollins, Random House,
Hachette, Simon & Schuster, Penguin, and Macmillan—are refusing to sign new
contracts with Amazon. The online
bookseller is looking to increase the co-op promotional fees (money the
publishers pay a bookseller to promote their titles), and publishers are refusing to sign on to the increase.
Perhaps even more significant is the anti-trust suit filed today by the US Department of Justice against Apple
Inc and five of the Big Six publishers, HarperCollins, Hachette, Simon &
Schuster, Penguin, and Macmillan. The
claim is that the publishers colluded amongst themselves and with Apple to set
e-book prices. In anticipation of the
launch of the iPad in 2010, publishers started using the agency model in 2009 when
selling their books to e-book retailers.
In the agency model, publishers set the price of books and the retailer
takes a percentage (usually 30%) cut of the sale. This differs from the traditional wholesale model
where publishers would sell books to retailers who would then set whatever
price they wanted.
In his letter supporting the publishers, President of the
Authors Guild, Scott Turow, explains the benefits of the agency model: “Two
years after the agency model came to bookselling, Amazon is losing its
chokehold on the e-book market: its share has fallen from about 90% to roughly
60%. Customers are benefiting from the surprisingly innovative e-readers Barnes
& Noble's investments have delivered, including a tablet device that beat
Amazon to the market by fully twelve months. Brick-and-mortar bookstores
are starting to compete through their partnership with Google, so loyal
customers can buy e-books from them at the same price as they would from
Amazon. Direct-selling authors have also
benefited, as Amazon more than doubled its royalty rates in the face of
competition.”
However, Attorney General Eric Holder sees the publishers’
business model differently. He cites
secret business luncheons attended by publishers to discuss fixing the prices
of e-books. “As a result of this alleged
conspiracy, we believe that consumers paid millions of dollars more for some of
the most popular titles,” he said.
In addition to the federal suit, 16 states, including Ohio,
have also filed their own anti-trust suits against publishers. Several settlements have already been reached
at both the federal and state levels, but Apple, Macmillan, and Penguin insist
they will keep fighting the charges in court.
Find more about the anti-trust suits at these sites:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)